Charles Sicher wrote:

Both subscription systems I manage have been like this for 2 weeks. Will this be fixed, or should we abandon this distro?

I think you have some stuck yum processes, since I had the same problem





If you are following this forum you would have noticed that there is no support any more.

Why installing an old version.
Since your installing a clean install you can use the latest version 7.9

http://mirror.clearos.com/clearos/7/iso/x86_64/ClearOS-DVD-x86_64.iso

Maybe you wil face the same problem because COS is not maintaned anymore, but give it a try i would say

Mick L wrote:

Newbe trying out ClearOS here. Has there been an update to this?

No. And i don’t expect any
Centos 7 is almost EOL and COS is a bit abanded.
A lot of users had moved to another distro

Newbe trying out ClearOS here. Has there been an update to this?

Manuel Alejandro Aravena wrote:

Hi, I'm having some trouble with my domain and accessing clearos. I renew, every so often, my certificate, I did this last week and all worked fine except that i can't access Clearos on port 81. mydomain.com works fine in https, but as soon as i go to mydomecin.com:81 it gives me an error and can't access clearos. it says the certificate has expired, and I check it and is still the old certificate, how come mydomain.com has the new certificate and when it goes to port 81 it shows the old certificate, and how can I fix this ??

Thanks

Manuel

check in webconfig system/security/Let's Encrypt
and click on the button "view"

at the section "Deployed" you must see :

Hello everyone

I made some test repos with the following samba version with patch from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222250

samba-4.10.16-19
samba-4.10.16-20
samba-4.10.16-14

I made some test on my test Server and seems that works fine with Windows 10 and KB5028166.

cat >/etc/yum.repos.d/clearos-samba-test.repo <<EOL
[ClearOS-samba-4.10.16-19]
name=ClearOs-samba-4.10.16-24
baseurl=https://repos.click2c.eu/samba-4.10.16-19-RPMS
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
priority = 1

[ClearOS-samba-4.10.16-20]
name=ClearOs-samba-4.10.16-24
baseurl=https://repos.click2c.eu/samba-4.10.16-20-RPMS
enabled=0
gpgcheck=0
priority = 1

[ClearOS-samba-4.10.16-24]
name=ClearOs-samba-4.10.16-24
baseurl=https://repos.click2c.eu/samba-4.10.16-24-RPMS
enabled=0
gpgcheck=0
priority = 1
EOL

or yum upgrade if you enable version repo over 4.10.16-19

Hello everyone

I made some test repos with the following samba version with patch from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222250

samba-4.10.16-19
samba-4.10.16-20
samba-4.10.16-14

I made some test on my test Server and seems that works fine with Windows 10 and KB5028166.

cat >/etc/yum.repos.d/clearos-samba-test.repo <<EOL
[ClearOS-samba-4.10.16-19]
name=ClearOs-samba-4.10.16-24
baseurl=https://repos.click2c.eu/samba-4.10.16-19-RPMS
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0
priority = 1

[ClearOS-samba-4.10.16-20]
name=ClearOs-samba-4.10.16-24
baseurl=https://repos.click2c.eu/samba-4.10.16-20-RPMS
enabled=0
gpgcheck=0
priority = 1

[ClearOS-samba-4.10.16-24]
name=ClearOs-samba-4.10.16-24
baseurl=https://repos.click2c.eu/samba-4.10.16-24-RPMS
enabled=0
gpgcheck=0
priority = 1
EOL

or yum upgrade if you enable version repo over 4.10.16-19

Strange, but it looks like some post are missing.
Maybe a bug on the forum

14 september 22:06

John Jarrett replied to the discussion Another security vulnerability in ClamAV, the antivirus scanner
@ Nick,
My apologies as I was not asking you to do it for free. Just why are you doing it for free for Clear as that is what it still seems? They know you can do it but if they are not going to do anything with your contributions, whether for free or pay you for them, then do it for the users and on a paid basis. Maybe like a support contract.

John

PS I did PM you.

14 september 21:58

Nick Howitt replied to the discussion Another security vulnerability in ClamAV, the antivirus scanner
If I do it for free, I undermine my offering to Clearcenter. At the same time, I know that Clearcenter are not able build and distribute what I provide them as their build system is broken and they have lost the ability to put signed packages into the repos. It is just a way of showing I can do the updates.

14 september 21:26

John Jarrett replied to the discussion Another security vulnerability in ClamAV, the antivirus scanner
@Nick

Very understandable but if they are not paying you for your time and updates, why should you continue to do so for Clear... and for free? Why not make some money form the CleArOS users who haven't stepped away from it... yet... Just need to get my rear end in gear.

In any event, I certainly would be willing to pay for updates thru you. I will PM you later today to see what can be worked out. Seems like a good side activity for you.

John

@Nick

Very understandable but if they are not paying you for your time and updates, why should you continue to do so for Clear... and for free? Why not make some money form the CleArOS users who haven't stepped away from it... yet... Just need to get my rear end in gear.

In any event, I certainly would be willing to pay for updates thru you. I will PM you later today to see what can be worked out. Seems like a good side activity for you.

John

Nick Howitt wrote:

Please can I ask you to remember that I used to be paid by Clearcenter to do these updates. Some are easy, but this one was non-trivial costing me hours of my time. At the same time many people are paying Clearcenter for updates and for "Enterprise Grade Security" as advertised on their website. It is up to Clearcenter to honour their contracts with their customers and provide the updates.

I did offer a service to Clearcenter to provide updates. I can do it at 2 levels, either just updating Clearcenter Apps for critical vulnerabilities, and I'd include the Samba Logon patch with that or I could provide a full update service keeping people completely up to date with upstream as well. Unfortunately for the users (Paid and Free) they have declined to do business. If anyone is interested they are welcome to message me directly, but it would have to be a paid service.

Fully understandable
Nick has helped us out many times paid or unpaid

Michael has to make a move on this topic, but he refuses to post a message or give us customers a decent reply